Dispelling the Myth: Processing Auto Claims Will Cost Your Financial Institution Money

Posted by DIMONT on August 3, 2017 at 9:30 AM

Red Ring Binder with Inscription Vehicle Insurance on Background of Working Table with Office Supplies, Laptop, Reports. Toned Illustration. Business Concept on Blurred Background.-697592-edited.jpeg

Having been in the business of helping loan servicers file insurance claims and recover losses for many years, we’re consistently surprised by a persistent myth that seems to almost be part of the auto finance industry’s collective consciousness: that the insurance claims process on damaged vehicles is actually a net loss to the lender.

The claims process can be time consuming and can generate low success rates when a lender who handles this process in house doesn’t have experienced licensed adjusters on staff. Labor intensive process combined with low success rates and cost of full-time equivalent (FTE) actually support this very myth and will make any CFO question if they are spending $2.00 to recover $1.00.

Experienced licensed adjustors will reduce cycle times and improve success rates, but at what FTE cost to the lender? Add in the fact that 11 states require a licensed attorney to file a claim and the lender has either added additional costs or made the decision to not go after claims in those states.

The Financial Benefits of Outsourcing your Claims Process

Lenders should be willing to partner with a company of licensed claims adjusting professionals that are well versed in the workings of the insurance industry and experienced in negotiating and recovering on these policies. The right partner will move swiftly to collect the required information and file the claim through automated data feeds and systemic processes to reduce cycle and recovery times. In our clients’ cases, we have placed a lot of focus on our internal processes and have seen cycle and recovery times improve each month.

As for costs, different companies operate under different business models, but our clients never see a bill from us unless we recover, and we do not bill them for expenses. There are no hidden or inexplicable fees attached with any of our contracts. This is a real opportunity for lenders because of the high percentage of repossessions that have chargeable damage that can be claimed on an insurance policy when one is in force. In fact, a recent study of our clients’ portfolios found that 70% of their repossessions had chargeable damage with an average of around $2,000 in damage per unit. What would recovering an additional $2,000 do to your recovery rate on that particular vehicle?

If you are handling the claims process in house, the simplest way to determine how much your institution could benefit by outsourcing the claims process would be to set up a champion challenger with your internal team. If you have elected to not file claims because of costs, send a few test files of repossessions with signs of damage to find out how much money you’re leaving on the table.

Naturally, every auto lender’s portfolio will differ and you won’t know about your own until you do a deeper dive. Lenders who operate under the preconceived notion that filing claims is just a cost center are missing out on the opportunity to reduce losses on auto loans that default.

Download White Paper:  Compliance Doesn’t Have to Be a Burden for Servicers When Processing Hazard, Flood and Auto Insurance Claims

Topics: Auto Insurance Claims